Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 17
03/30/2010 01:00 PM House TRANSPORTATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB333 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 313 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 333 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE TRANSPORTATION STANDING COMMITTEE
March 30, 2010
1:05 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Peggy Wilson, Chair
Representative Craig Johnson, Vice Chair
Representative Kyle Johansen
Representative Cathy Engstrom Munoz
Representative Tammie Wilson
Representative Max Gruenberg
Representative Pete Petersen
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 333
"An Act directing the Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities to develop and implement standards and operating
procedures allowing for the use in the construction and
maintenance of transportation projects and public facilities and
in the construction of projects by public and private entities
of gravel or aggregate materials that contain naturally
occurring asbestos, and authorizing use on an interim basis of
those materials for certain transportation projects and public
facilities; and relating to certain claims arising out of or in
connection with the use of gravel or aggregate materials."
- MOVED CSHB 333(TRA) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 313
"An Act relating to the maintenance and repair of railroad
crossings and rights-of-way within railroad crossings."
- BILL HEARING RESCHEDULED TO 4/01/10
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 333
SHORT TITLE: NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS IN GRAVEL
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) JOULE
02/10/10 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/10/10 (H) TRA, FIN
03/30/10 (H) TRA AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 17
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE REGGIE JOULE
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as prime sponsor of HB 333.
DEWEY HOFFMAN, Staff
Representative Reggie Joule
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska.
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified on behalf of Representative
Reggie Joule, the prime sponsor of HB 333.
CHRISTINE HESS, Staff
Representative Reggie Joule
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified on behalf of Representative
Reggie Joule, the prime sponsor of HB 333.
LANCE MILLER, Vice-President, Resources
NANA Regional Corporation
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 333.
MARY SIROKY, Legislative Liaison
Office of the Commissioner
Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the discussion of
HB 333.
LORI VERBRUGGE, Toxicologist
Department of Health and Social Services
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the discussion of
HB 333.
WILDA LAUGHLIN
Special Assistant
Department of Health and Social Services (DH&SS)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the discussion of
HB 333.
MARIT CARLSON-VAN DORT, Legislative Liaison
Office of the Commissioner
Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the discussion of
HB 333.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:05:02 PM
CHAIR PEGGY WILSON called the House Transportation Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:05 p.m. Representatives P.
Wilson, Gruenberg, Petersen, and T. Wilson were present at the
call to order. Representatives Munoz, Johnson, and Johansen
arrived as the meeting was in progress.
HB 333-NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS IN GRAVEL
1:05:06 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the only order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 333, "An Act directing the Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities to develop and implement
standards and operating procedures allowing for the use in the
construction and maintenance of transportation projects and
public facilities and in the construction of projects by public
and private entities of gravel or aggregate materials that
contain naturally occurring asbestos, and authorizing use on an
interim basis of those materials for certain transportation
projects and public facilities; and relating to certain claims
arising out of or in connection with the use of gravel or
aggregate materials." [Before the committee was Version E.]
1:06:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE T. WILSON moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 333, labeled 26-LS1248\S, Chenoweth,
3/16/10, as the work draft. There being no objection, Version S
was before the committee.
1:06:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REGGIE JOULE, Alaska State Legislature, explained
that HB 333 would authorize and regulate use of naturally
occurring asbestos (NOA), which is due to minerals present in
the soil and rocks. This has become problematic in Ambler since
there are many projects that need aggregate material, such as
the airport or sewage lagoon. He offered that he is working
towards resolution of the issue. He introduced his staff, Dewey
Hoffman, who is working on the issue of NOA, and asked him to
provide more details on HB 333.
DEWEY HOFFMAN, Staff, Representative Reggie Joule, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of the sponsor, Representative Reggie
Joule provided an overview on the bill. He stated that HB 333
would put policies in place to mitigate the difficulties
associated with construction in areas of the state with
naturally occurring asbestos (NOA). He stated that NOA occurs
in mineral deposits throughout Alaska and our state has large
known deposits of ultramafic and serpentine mineral ore. These
deposits often contain NOA, which is similar to the asbestos we
are familiar with and that is known to cause fibrosis or
malignancies of the lungs and other major organs. Asbestos is
defined in the bill as gravel, rock, sand and similar materials
that are determined to have a content of at least 0.25 percent
asbestos by mass, setting the threshold for NOA at 0.25 percent.
MR. HOFFMAN said the Department of Transportation & Public
Facilities (DOT&PF) hired Nortech, Inc. and the Institute of
Northern Engineering, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, to
research the issues and recommend solutions. He referred to a
series of maps in members' packets which show mineral
occurrences in Alaska that likely contain NOA. He also referred
to pages 29-32 of the full report titled, Naturally Occurring
Asbestos in Alaska and Experiences and Policy of Other States
Regarding its Use. This report concludes that NOA can be used
in most circumstances without harmful side effects so long as
proper procedures are implemented and followed, he stated.
MR. HOFFMAN explained that there are documented cases of NOA
being found in several areas of the state, including at a rock
quarry in Juneau, along the Dalton Highway at material site 105,
and in local gravel pits in Ambler. The NOA was discovered
during routine soil testing and has delayed or halted, as in
Ambler's case, construction projects for years. Current
projects in Ambler that are affected include the Ambler Airport
Runway Extension Project, construction of a new sewer lagoon and
access road, and housing construction. Some experts believe
that over time more NOA will be documented, particularly in the
very areas that are rich in minerals and likely to be developed.
Some localities do not have gravel materials nearby that are
free of NOA, yet several large projects will require the use of
large amounts of gravel. How to handle NOA should be resolved
before it becomes an issue during the actual preconstruction or
construction process of one of these projects. He referred
members to page 27 of the Nortech, Inc. report for more detailed
information. He stated that the use of NOA is not currently
regulated by the federal government and only a few states, such
as Virginia and California have addressed it.
1:12:05 PM
MR. HOFFMAN reported that Virginia and California have been
regulating NOA for many years and several other states are in
the process of addressing the issue. California uses a
threshold for asbestos concentration, below which the material
is not considered NOA. Regulation controls are put into place
for safety reasons if the material is above the established
threshold. This bill has adopted a similar approach. He
summarized that the purpose of the bill is to define the
measures that must be developed and established in order to
safely use gravel or materials containing NOA. After procedures
and standards are adopted and a site-specific plan is approved
for a construction project, HB 333 would protect the suppliers
and users from liability so long as the plan is appropriately
followed. The bill would remove the doubt and fear of liability
associated with use of NOA, which would encourage suppliers and
landowners to offer gravel for sale. This would ensure that
work could safely proceed in Alaska while using gravel that has
some NOA. This would also help keep construction costs down, he
stated.
1:13:54 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON related her understanding that health problems
are caused by direct contact with asbestos. She asked what
causes the concern if the NOA is contained within the rock.
1:14:48 PM
CHRISTINE HESS, Staff, Representative Reggie Joule, Alaska State
Legislature, explained that the biggest concern comes from all-
terrain vehicles (ATVs) use, which substantially raises dust
levels during the summer months. She explained that the
Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the
Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) have conducted
tests in Ambler to identify health issues. The DHSS chest X-ray
monitoring only found several people with an indication in their
lungs, but the health problems could be attributed to other
factors such as smoking. The departments are discussing dust
control measures to mitigate health risks.
1:16:30 PM
LANCE MILLER, Vice-President, Resources, NANA Regional
Corporation testified in support of HB 333. He stated that
currently there is and will continue to be a critical need for
gravel for projects throughout Alaska and some gravel may
contain asbestos. He recalled that Mr. Hoffman previously
mentioned the issues that arose in the 70s on the Dalton Highway
project and in 2005 with a Juneau gravel project. He mentioned
a chronology of projects exist, but without some protocols in
place for gravel containing trace amounts of NOA, many projects
will come to a standstill with all the notoriety that asbestos
has received nationwide. Asbestos comes from magnesium silicate
minerals associated with ultramafic rocks. Interestingly, a lot
of the mineral deposits that have formed are located near
geologically dynamic area, where the ultramafic rocks have been
brought up along the sea floor. Thus, it is not a random
coincidence that mineral deposits contain magnesium-rick rocks
that contain NOA minerals. In fact, many parts of the state
from Juneau to the Arctic region contain mineral deposits and
asbestos, but not necessarily at a level to cause any alarm. He
referred specifically to the mountains behind Ambler, to Jade
Mountain, which is comprised of serpentine. He remarked that
the state gem is jade, which also comes from ultramafic rock.
California's geology has similar problems to the ones
encountered in Alaska's geology. The state rock of California
is serpentine, which is the main asbestos bearing rock.
California adopted regulations to address NOA, which are similar
to the process reflected in HB 333. He commented that
California has a record of being protective of health and the
environment.
1:20:14 PM
MR. MILLER related that within the Ambler region about $10
million in projects are currently on hold. He offered his
belief that not moving forward with projects, such as the
planned sewer lagoon and water projects, would affect the health
and safety of the residents of Ambler. Using the California
standards, some sites in the Ambler area are asbestos free.
Adopting the standards in HB 333, which are basically the
California standards, would allow projects to move forward and
would provide protection so long as the standard operating
procedures are adhered to by landowners and contractors.
1:21:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked for examples of how California is
mitigating their asbestos issues.
MR. MILLER offered his understanding that much of the mitigation
has occurred by adopting methods of handling material, such as
wearing respirators when crushing rock that contains NOA or
wetting down the material. The mineral is fibrous and when dry
will float in the air, but NOA has water-absorbing properties
will not float in the air when wet. California has addressed
NOA by developing specific procedures quarries or gravel pits to
protect workers. In Alaska, such as at Stabler Point in Juneau,
the material is contained within rock so crushing the rock can
liberate the NOA. In other locations, such as in Ambler, the
natural forces have crushed the rock and released the NOA into
streams. Thus, the NOA is contained in gravel.
1:22:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN referred to HB 333 and asked for the
reference to any language that mandates masks be used to protect
workers who may be exposed to NOA.
MR. MILLER explained the process for handling NOA would be
developed as part of the standard operating procedures (SOP)
that would be developed under the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON suggested that the procedures would
likely be developed in regulation.
1:23:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether "fear of asbestos in the air"
would generally cause agencies to "shut down" a project and if
such action would be undertaken by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
MR. MILLER responded that usually a project would be shut down
by the landowner since SOPs are not currently in place to
protect the landowner from risk.
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ related her understanding that if the SOPs
were in place the landowner would be afforded some legal
protection.
MR. MILLER agreed that the SOPs would provide some immunity.
1:24:44 PM
MARY SIROKY, Legislative Liaison, Office of the Commissioner,
Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF),
explained that three agencies have been working to resolve the
issues surrounding NOA in Ambler. The agencies have arrived at
some short-term solutions. Thus, HB 333 will not be needed
since the three agencies have agreed to develop the SOP for
operations on state land. The three agencies, the Department of
Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF), Department of
Health and Social Services (DH&SS), and Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) have committed to work with
Representative Joule to formulate an agreed upon plan for the
projects in Ambler by June 1. The departments have committed to
work during the legislative interim to develop the standard
operating procedure (SOP) for other sites. She restated that by
June 1, 2010, the DOT&PF will develop a plan, in conjunction
with DH&SS and DEC, to address the Ambler project sites and
during the rest of the year plans to develop the SOP for other
state-owned sites. She stated that the departments will also
develop recommendations for third-party sites. In response to
Chair P. Wilson, she restated the department's goals to address
NOA.
1:28:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON asked for the DOT&PF to report to the
committee next legislature.
MS. SIROKY agreed to do so.
1:28:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE T. WILSON asked whether the departments' plans
would also address the issue for private properties.
MS. SIROKY answered that she was unaware of any projects with
delays due to NOA that are not state projects.
1:29:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked for an indication of the past
success rate for cooperation between the DOT&PF, DH&SS, and DEC.
MS. SIROKY related that most of the difficulties have surrounded
procedures for third-party aspects of NOA. She related that the
three departments have agreed that solutions can be found for
state-owned properties.
1:30:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON related he has not observed much inter-
agency cooperation to give him optimism that June 1, 2010 is a
realistic date. He said he is not certain that HB 333 is not
needed.
MS. SIROKY, in response to Representative Johansen, stated that
the Ambler issue has been "on the radar screen for about a
year." She recalled the DOT&PF previously worked on NOA issues
on the Dalton Highway in the 70s. This is the first issue in
recent history that she could remember. In further response to
Representative Johansen, she related that the interagency
agreement between the three departments was reached yesterday.
1:31:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN asked to hear from the sponsor at some
point.
MS. SIROKY, in response to Chair P. Wilson, with respect to NOA,
offered her belief that the DEC has been involved for some time
on the issues of NOA.
1:31:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE T. WILSON asked whether the DOT&PF will be able
to solve the issue without the $355,000 shown in the fiscal note
MS. SIROKY answered that since the departments have agreed they
can resolve the issues without the bill, that the DOT&PF will
not need the funding. She explained that the fiscal note
assumed that certain accounting and regulation's projects would
be needed. Under the current plan, the DOT&PF will not develop
databases and regulations for third-party ownership. In further
response to Representative T. Wilson, she explained that the
state does not need to develop regulations to address methods
the state will follow. The process that will be used is the
three commissioners will set mandates for their respective
departments to implement.
1:33:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE T. WILSON asked whether the DOT&PF will develop
regulations for private parties.
MS. SIROKY related that under the agreement the departments
reached, the DOT&PF will address the state-owned sites in
Ambler. Secondly, the DOT&PF will develop policies and
procedures for other state-owned sites, and finally, the DOT&PF
will develop recommendations for other parties to proceed. In
further response to Representative T. Wilson, she gave an
example of third parties, such as a tribal organization who may
wish to use naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) to build a road
on tribal property. Additionally, she anticipated some
municipalities may encounter similar issues. She pointed out
that her expertise is not in asbestos and the EPA does not
currently regulate NOA. The current federal regulations for
asbestos are limited to worker safety. Thus, NOA, which becomes
a fiber in the natural environment and poses a serious health
threat poses a different situation than the normal issues
encountered, such as during removal of asbestos insulation. She
explained some difficulties in Alaska that are not present in
California. In California, their roads connect so paving may be
a solution to eliminate NOA issues. The problem is more complex
in Alaska, with its remote areas and gravel roads or runways in
villages.
1:35:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN referred to the fiscal note analysis
which estimated it would take a year and a half to complete the
SOP. He asked how the departments would be able to accomplish
the work by June 1, 2010.
MS. SIROKY answered that the fiscal note anticipated the
development of regulations to address third parties would take
time, as well as time necessary to identify the scope of
institutional controls. The issue is very complicated, but when
the NOA oversight is limited to state sites, the state can
better monitor and track the management of NOA. In further
response to Representative Petersen, she agreed that the
departments believe they can find solutions to the issues at the
Ambler airport. In response to Chair P. Wilson, she affirmed
DOT&PF is not aware of any sites other than state-owned entities
in which projects have been halted.
CHAIR P. WILSON restated that the DOT&PF will work with the
other agencies to develop policies and will come back to the
legislature with suggestions for procedures when the NOA
involves third parties.
MS. SIROKY agreed.
1:37:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked whether the fiscal note could be
zeroed out if the public portion was removed from HB 333 and the
bill only applied to the state.
MS. SIROKY stated that she did not know for certain. However,
she offered her belief that is the argument she is currently
making on this issue. In further response to Representative
Johnson, she said she thought that the fiscal note could be a
zero fiscal note, but would need to re-read the bill to see if
any other implications were in the bill that would necessitate
additional funding.
1:39:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked for the reason that the DOT&PF has
not already addressed this issue if it is so easy to fix.
MS. SIROKY related that the DOT&PF has held "pointed
conversations" on this topic with the other agencies. The
departments found that when third parties were removed that they
could reach agreement. The departments experienced the most
difficulty over determining the "final regulator" for third
parties. The main stumbling block surrounded who would
ultimately regulate the NOA. Since the NOA issues at Ambler are
limited to the state, the departments felt they could reach an
agreement for the standard and the SOP. She offered her belief
that once the SOP is in place, the departments can work through
the issues to regulate third parties. In further response to
Representative Johnson, she clarified that the "pointed
conversations" were held with the "sister agencies."
1:41:57 PM
MS. SIROKY, in response to Representative Johnson, reiterated
that the DOT&PF believes it can develop the methodology for
addressing the issue at Ambler and can develop SOPs for other
state-owned sites.
MARIT CARLSON-VAN DORT, Legislative Liaison, Office of the
Commissioner, on behalf of the Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC), agreed the department has held conversations
with the bill sponsor, the DOT&PF, and the DH&SS. The three
departments agreed to find interim solutions for the issues at
Ambler. She further agreed that "it did get a little bit
stickier" when the agencies discussed regulating third parties
and where the authority would ultimately lie. She explained
that DEC does not have authority over asbestos, although it does
have authority over ambient air quality. The EPA does not
regulate ambient air asbestos, but regulates asbestos in Title
V, which is the asbestos related to demolition and the related
human health issues. Thus, the problem surrounded who would
develop the standards, whether the standards should be in
statute or in regulation, and the role of the DH&SS in
developing health standards for NOA. The DOT&PF responsibility
would determine the material specifications and usage. During
the legislative interim, the DEC, in conjunction with the other
departments will review asbestos product usage, whether it can
be used as fill or if a cap of clean material would be required.
She maintained her belief that a solution for Ambler can be
found and solutions could be arrived at during the legislative
interim, which may also result in suggestions for statute
changes to present to the legislature.
1:45:12 PM
MS. CARLSON-VAN DORT, in response to Representative T. Wilson,
answered that the DEC wants to ensure that Ambler can complete
its current project. Any additional project not currently
slated will become part of the discussion during the legislature
interim with respect to use of NOA materials. In further
response to Representative T. Wilson, she responded that
removing third parties from HB 333 does not resolve other
issues, such as determining and setting the standard in
regulation. Additionally, the DEC will review the 0.25
threshold identified in the bill to determine whether it is the
appropriate standard.
1:46:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked whether the DEC believes the
standard is too high or too low or if the DEC has had time to
consider the standard.
MS. CARLSON-VAN DORT stated that she did do not know at this
time. The standard in HB 333 was modeled after the California
standard. California caps and paves most of their roads, which
removes the ambient air and dust issue. While communities in
rural Alaska also have ambient NOA air and dust issues, paving
is very expensive so other solutions must be found.
1:47:30 PM
LORI VERBRUGGE, Toxicologist, Department of Health and Social
Services, stated she has been involved in Ambler issue since
2004 or 2005. She offered that the DH&SS is enthusiastic to
work on these issues with the other departments.
1:48:42 PM
WILDA LAUGHLIN, Special Assistant, Department of Health and
Social Services (DH&SS), offered her belief that the three
departments can work together as Ms. Siroky outlined. In
response to Representative T. Wilson, she related her
understanding that this has primarily been an issue between the
DOT&PF and the DEC. She stated that the DH&SS may need to weigh
in on the health aspects and is willing to do so. She offered
that the Division of Public Health is working to define the
DH&SS's role with respect to NOA.
1:50:34 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON recalled some testing has been conducted in
Ambler to find out if residents are experiencing health issues,
primarily associated with their lungs.
MS. LAUGHLIN stated that Ms. Verbrugge is better able to assess
that question. In response to Representative Johnson, she
related that the commissioners are discussing the NOA issues.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON stated he wanted to hear that the
commitment is coming from the top level.
MS. LAUGHLIN stated she has briefed Commissioner Hogan.
MS. SIROKY related that Deputy Commissioner Frank Richards is
supportive of the plan, as is Roger Healy, the Director of
Statewide Design & Engineering Standards. In further response
to Representative Johnson, she indicated that the NOA issue
falls under the responsibility of Mr. Richards. She offered to
call Commissioner von Scheben for his approval.
MS. CARLSON-VAN DORT related recent conversations she held with
Deputy Commissioner Dan Easton and Acting Director of the
Division of Air Quality Alice Edwards. She further reported she
held discussions last week with Commissioner Hartig and all
three are supportive of the NOA agreement.
1:53:40 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON asked Ms. Verbrugge to report on investigations
and decisions made with respect to NOA in Ambler.
MS. VERBRUGGE explained during the 2004-2005 period, some
reports were made to the community. A medical epidemiologist
reviewed charts and X-Rays to determine the extent of asbestos
diseases, but the outcome was inconclusive. The epidemiologist
did not find direct cause and effect for Mesothelioma, which is
a type of lung disease directly linked to asbestos. The
epidemiologist found some evidence of lung diseases was
consistent with asbestos lung disease, but the final results
were not definitive. Thus, the question is still open as to
whether health effects in Ambler were due to contact with NOA.
In 2005, the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR) collected samples and determined that the
exposure by simply walking across the side of the road or along
the street would constitute a health hazard for residents of
Ambler. The DH&SS has not eliminated the potential for concerns
in Ambler, she stated.
CHAIR P. WILSON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 333.
1:57:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOULE stated that the people in the community of
Ambler have pushed for a change. Mayor Morgan Johnson of Ambler
has observed the capital projects languish in the community and
has worked hard to find solutions to the project delays. In
addition to the efforts taken by the DOT&PF, and DEC, the tribal
health personnel in NANA, Manilaq, and the Alaska Native Tribal
Health Consortium (ANTHC) have all worked together to attempt to
move this issue forward.
REPRESENTATIVE JOULE remarked the tendency to "shoot the
messengers," but this issue predates today's testifiers. He
said he thought that "we can get there." The appropriate
department commitments have been made on the record and to him
personally. First and foremost, this issue is about the health
and safety of the citizens of Ambler. Further, this issue is
about economic development in an area that would benefit from
it. In 2003, this issue was initiated, but if a road to Nome is
ever undertaken NOA regulations will need to be adopted. He
offered his belief the agencies understand and recognize the
issue and if this can be accomplished it will happen. He stated
he would also appreciate it if the committee could move the bill
forward.
REPRESENTATIVE JOULE, in response to Representative Johnson,
answered that any liability to the state would be considered as
part of the bill and be addressed in the SOP.
2:02:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ moved to report the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 333 labeled, 26-LS1248\S, Chenoweth,
3/16/10, out of committee with individual recommendations and
the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection,
CSHB 333(TRA) was reported form the House Transportation
Standing Committee.
2:03:19 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Transportation Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 2:03
p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 333 Backup Appendix 3.pdf |
HTRA 3/30/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 333 |
| HB 333 backup INE study.pdf |
HTRA 3/30/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 333 |
| hb 333 letter 2.pdf |
HTRA 3/30/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 333 |
| HB 333 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HTRA 3/30/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 333 |
| HB 333 Sectional for Ver S.pdf |
HTRA 3/30/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 333 |
| HB333 Backup.pdf |
HTRA 3/30/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 333 |
| CSHB 333 Ver S.pdf |
HTRA 3/30/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 333 |